KC or NOT?

Subject: KC or NOT? Mon 02 Nov 2009, 4:23 am

Do you think its such a big issue if your dogs are not KC registered?

Subject: Re: KC or NOT? Mon 02 Nov 2009, 4:32 am

buffy is kc but we told shaz we didnt want the papers she is a pet and a much loved one at that we do have the papers but to me they mean nothing other than i did find it interesting going right back through the generations .

Subject: Re: KC or NOT? Mon 02 Nov 2009, 4:44 am

Neither of mine are KC although I was told with both of them that one of the parents was kc reg whether I believe that or not in another story but as you say I love them they are my babies and I don't care about the papers.

Subject: Re: KC or NOT? Mon 02 Nov 2009, 4:57 am

thats all that does matter hun we love em and they are well behaved little staffys xx

Subject: Re: KC or NOT? Mon 02 Nov 2009, 5:00 am

non kc it means nothing what so ever unless you want to show at cruft really

Subject: Re: KC or NOT? Mon 02 Nov 2009, 5:00 am

Well behaved? Can we swap lol

Subject: Re: KC or NOT? Mon 02 Nov 2009, 5:05 am

lololololol we cant swap but ill have daisy and eddie aswell lololol

Subject: Re: KC or NOT? Mon 02 Nov 2009, 6:52 am

Roob is a cross so he's not registered anyway.

I hope to get another staffie one day and viewing the home and talking to the breeders about their ethics and the way they treat the parents is far more important to me than having papers with them.

The only thing in my house to have pedigree's are some of the rats and I agree thought that it is interesting to see how the generations go back, especially as I know the people who own my rats great grandparents! lol

Subject: Re: KC or NOT? Mon 02 Nov 2009, 8:26 am

We have the papers for our two, and it is interesting googleing the names and seeing the relatives of our fur babies, however as mentioned before I do enjoy showing although i do only do it for charity, so papers aren't always necesary, my last pooch Eric, was a rescue SBT and he came 3rd in best of breed first year and 1st in best of breed in his second,(his pic is in my profile) so papers dont matter to me. Another hobby of mine is agility, again papers are not necesary.

Subject: Re: KC or NOT? Mon 02 Nov 2009, 9:28 am

Lol Jo the way daisy is being lately you can have her till she is about 2 that ok with you? lol.

Subject: Re: KC or NOT? Mon 02 Nov 2009, 9:39 am

oh noooooooooo you cant have her back lololol

Subject: Re: KC or NOT? Mon 02 Nov 2009, 9:46 am

Lol darn.

Subject: Re: KC or NOT? Mon 02 Nov 2009, 10:54 am

Neither of mine are KC reg, but i wasn't bothered anyway as i only wanted pets to love, and love me back. I have a feeling that if i tried to register them it would be pointless as i dont think either of them have kc parents or grandparents (despite what their family trees say!)

Subject: Re: KC or NOT? Mon 02 Nov 2009, 10:57 am

wellllllllllll i said the same about buffys papers as i did to jas when he proposed whats a bit of paper when we is in love ( had be nice he watching lololol)

Subject: Re: KC or NOT? Mon 02 Nov 2009, 10:59 am

Subject: Re: KC or NOT? Mon 02 Nov 2009, 11:15 am

Admin Jo wrote:

wellllllllllll i said the same about buffys papers as i did to jas when he proposed whats a bit of paper when we is in love ( had be nice he watching lololol)

Is he KC registered?

Subject: Re: KC or NOT? Mon 02 Nov 2009, 11:19 am

nah he welsh mungrel lololol

Subject: Re: KC or NOT? Mon 02 Nov 2009, 11:42 am

Admin Jo wrote:

nah he welsh mungrel lololol

He obviosuly not watching now then

Subject: Re: KC or NOT? Mon 02 Nov 2009, 11:44 am

nope he gone bed lolololol

Subject: Re: KC or NOT? Tue 03 Nov 2009, 9:50 am

I have had 4 staffies and Reuben is the first K C registered dog we have had (others have all been rescue)
We did not choose to get a KC registered dog, he was being rehomed at 6 months and happened to be KC reg. We were more interested in his personality and if he got on with Chloe.
He has been castrated so he cannot be bred or shown so it does not really matter about the KC